Main Article Content


The aim of this study is to explore the effect of positive learning culture in students’ blended learning process. The starting point of this study is the analysis of the core values of positive learning culture and its influence on students’ learning in a blended classroom environment based on literature studies. The results of analyzing data from 339 student respondents, who experienced in a blended classroom environment where successfully established positive learning cultures led to interesting findings. The existence of a positive learning culture in blended classrooms has a positive effect on students’ learning success. The results of correlation analysis recognize that there is a positive correlation between a learning culture and the blended learning process of the students. The culture of trust and respect has a positive effect on the theory lecture and lecture notes phase of the blended learning process. The culture of independence has a positive effect on VLE and RLOs phase of the blended learning process. The culture of trust, respect, and collaboration has a positive effect on physical planning. Finally, the culture of respect and independence have a positive effect on practical labs / classrooms phase of the blended learning process. These findings provide practical implications for educators in promoting more of one or more of the core values of positive learning culture in each phase of the blended learning process.


Blended Learning Process Experiential Learning Learning Culture Reusable Learning Objects Virtual Learning Environment

Article Details

How to Cite
Hung, T. T., Tuyet, N. T., Long, N. T., & Hanh, N. V. (2020). The effect of positive learning culture in students’ blended learning process. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(3), 68-75.


  1. Blended Learning Universe (2014). Create the culture. Michael B. Horn & Heather Staker.
  2. Choshin, M., & Ghaffari, A. (2017). An investigation of the impact of effective factors on the success of e-commerce in small-and medium-sized companies. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 67-74.
  3. Cramp, A., & Lamond, C. (2016). Engagement and kindness in digitally mediated learning with teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(1), 1-12.
  4. Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 236-241.
  5. Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3).
  6. Eid, M., & Nuhu, N. (2009). The impact of learning culture and information technology use on knowledge-sharing: A case of KFUPM. In 17th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2009 Proceedings (pp. 110-121). Verona, Italy, from 8 Jun 2009 to 10 Jun 2009.
  7. Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning Environments. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 8(4), 251-256.
  8. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
  9. Greenberg, P. S., Greenberg, R. H., & Antonucci, Y. L. (2007). Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams. Business horizons, 50(4), 325-333.
  10. Hanh, NV. (2020). Creating a blended learning culture in the classroom. Journal of Education Management, Vol 12, No. 6, 17-24.
  11. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of management information systems, 14(4), 29-64.
  12. Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13.
  13. Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.
  14. Johnston, R., & Hawke, G. (2002). Case studies of organisations with established learning cultures. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.
  15. Joo, B. K. B. (2007). The impact of contextual and personal characteristics on employee creativity in Korean firms (book). University of Minnesota publisher.
  16. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  17. Kurubacak, G. (2007). Building knowledge networks through project-based online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2668-2695.
  18. Long, N. T., & Van Hanh, N. (2020). A Structural Equation Model of Blended Learning Culture in the Classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 99-115.
  19. McCarthy, G. (2012). Virtual teams and blended learning. Edulearn 4th - International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 4867-4876). Barcelona, Spain: International Association of Technology, Education and Development.
  20. Mulyono, D. (2017). The influence of learning model and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes by controlling students’ early ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 689-708.
  21. Ng, E. M. (2010). A comparative study of blended learning activities between two classes. In Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE) (pp. 307-315). Jun 19 - 24 2010, Cassino, Italy.
  22. Powell, A., Galvin, J., & Piccoli, G. (2006). Antecedents to team member commitment from near and far: A comparison between collocated and virtual teams. Information Technology & People, 19(4), 299-322.
  23. Sarrafzadeh, M., Martin, B., & Hazeri, A. (2010). Knowledge management and its potential applicability for libraries. Library Management, 31 (3), 198-212.
  24. Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413.
  25. Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The internet and higher education, 7(1), 59-70.
  26. Stahl, G. K., & Sitkin, S. B. (2005). Trust in mergers and acquisitions. Mergers and acquisitions: Managing culture and human resources, 82-102.
  27. Stuart, A. (2013). Engaging Student’s Learning Through a Blended Learning Environment. INTED (International Technology, Education and Development Conference). pp. 2109-2118, ISBN: 978-84-616-2661-8. 4-5 March 2013, Valencia, Spain.
  28. Surjono, H. D., Muhtadi, A., & Wahyuningsih, D. (2017). The Implementation of Blended Learning in Multimedia Courses for Undergraduate Students in Indonesia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(10).
  29. Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. Journal of diagnostic medical sonography, 6(1), 35-39.
  30. Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: how to integrate online & traditional learning. Kogan Page Publishers.
  31. Tseng, H., & Ku, H. (2011). The relationships between trust, performance, satisfaction, and development progressions among virtual teams. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 81-94.
  32. Van Niekerk, M. P., & Schmidt, L. (2016). The ecology of distance learning: Bridging the gap between university and student. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(5), 196-214.
  33. Vickers, R., Field, J., & Melakoski, C. (2015). Media culture 2020: Collaborative teaching and blended learning using social media and cloud-based technologies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(1), 62-73.
  34. Wahyuni, E. (2018, July). Improving Students’ Independence and Collaboration With Blended Learning. In 2018 3rd International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts and Management Engineering (ICESAME 2018). Atlantis Press.
  35. Wojcicki, E., Izumi, L. T., & Chang, A. (2015). Moonshots in education: Launching blended learning in the classroom. Pacific Research Institute.
  36. Wong, L. (2013). Developing independent learning skills for postgraduate students through blended learning environment. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 15(1), 36-50.