Main Article Content


Obtaining metacognitive skills is crucial for enhancing self-regulation. So, this quasi-experimental study aimed to assess the effect of teaching metacognition through peer-conducted flipped classroom on high school students' self-regulation. 107 students filled out Self-Regulation Questionnaire as the pre-test. Both control and intervention groups received a package of four-session multimedia e-content about metacognition during four weeks. Each week, the students in the intervention group participated in a face-to-face session during which peers handled the instruction, while participants in the control group had teacher conducted sessions. Finally, the same questionnaire was answered as the post-test. The results showed a significant increase from pre to post-test scores in the intervention group, in contrast to the control one with no significant increase. Between groups comparison of post-test scores resulted in a significant higher score in the intervention group. So, the findings showed the positive effect of teaching metacognition through this method on students’ self-regulation.


Metacognition Self-Regulation Flipped Classroom Peer Learning High School

Article Details

Author Biography

Aeen Mohammadi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Department of e-Learning in Medical Education

How to Cite
Mohammadi, A., Mohammadi, M., Keshvari, N. Z., Mojtahedzadeh, R., Asadzandi, S., & Rahimifar Tehrani, B. (2022). Does teaching metacognitive skills through peer-conducted flipped classroom improve high school students’ self-regulation?. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(1), 94-100.


  1. Al Mulhim, E. N. (2021). Flipped learning, self-regulated learning and learning retention of students with internal/external locus of control. International Journal of Instruction, 14 (1), 827-846. doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14150a.
  2. Asikcan, M., & Saban, A. (2018). Prospective teachers' metacognitive awareness levels of reading strategies, Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13 (1), 23-30. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v13i1.3310.
  3. Avery, K., Huggan C., & Preston P. (2018). The flipped classroom: High school student engagement through 21st century learning, in education, 24 (1).
  4. Ayçiçek, B., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom model on students’ classroom engagement in teaching English, International Journal of Instruction, 11 (2), 385-398. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11226a.
  5. Bae H., & Kwon K. (2019). Developing metacognitive skills through class activities: What makes students use metacognitive skills?, Educational Studies, doi:10.1080/03055698.2019.1707068.
  6. Bilgin, I., & Geban, O. (2006). The effect of cooperative learning approach based on conceptual change condition on students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 31-46. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-0354-z.
  7. Bol, L., & Garner, J.K. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23 (2-3), 104-123. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9046-7.
  8. Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., Walck, C. C., & Nunnery, J. A. (2012). The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37 (4), 280-287. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.004.
  9. Borjalilu, S., Mojtahedzadeh, R., & Mohammadi, A. (2013). Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students, Journal of Medical Education and Development, 8 (2), 25-35.
  10. Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P.P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context, Journal of school psychology, 47 (5), 291-314. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002.
  11. Credé, M., & Phillips, L.A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire, Learning and Individual Differences, 21 (4), 337-346. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002.
  12. De Stasio, S., & Di Chiacchio, C. (2015). Metacognitive and self-regulated learning strategies profiles: An exploratory survey of a group of high school students, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (4), 656. doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p656.
  13. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes – insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 127-157. doi:10.1007/S11409-018-9181-X
  14. Elian, Sh. A., & Hamaidi, D.A. (2018). The effect of using flipped classroom strategy on the academic achievement of fourth grade students in Jordan, iJET, 13 (2), 110. doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7816.
  15. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry, American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
  16. Geres-Smith, R., Mercer, S. H., Archambault, C., & Bartfai, J. M. (2019). A preliminary component analysis of self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing in grades 5 to 7 in British Columbia, Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 34 (1), 38-55. doi:10.1177/0829573517739085.
  17. González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., Airado Rodríguez, D., & Cañada-Cañada F. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: An initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom, J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 25 (3), 450–9. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9.
  18. Graziano, K. J. (2017). Peer teaching in a flipped teacher education classroom, TechTrends, 61, 121–129. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0077-9.
  19. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In Handbook of Self-regulation of learning and performance, edited by B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk, 65–84. New York: Routledge.
  20. Harandi, V., Eslami Sharbabaki, H., Ahmadi Deh, M., & Darehkordi, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on social skills and problem-solving performance, J Psychol Psychother, 3, 121. doi:10.4172/2161-0487.1000121.
  21. Hong, E., & O'Neil, Jr. H. F. (2001). Construct validation of a trait self-regulation model, International Journal of Psychology, 36 (3), 186-194. doi: 10.1080/00207590042000146.
  22. Jaleel, S., & Premachandran, P. (2016). A study on the metacognitive awareness of secondary school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4, 165-172. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040121.
  23. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Holubec, E. J., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. ASCD.
  24. Karaoğlan Yilmaz, F.G., Olpak, Y. Z., & Yilmaz, R. (2018). The effect of the metacognitive support via pedagogical agent on self-regulation skills, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56 (2), 159-180. doi: 10.1177/0735633117707696.
  25. King, K. M., McLaughlin, K. A., Silk, J., & Monahan, K. C. (2018). Peer effects on self-regulation in adolescence depend on the nature and quality of the peer interaction, Development and Psychopathology, 30 (4), 1389-1401. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001560.
  26. Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: the effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training, American Educational Research Journal, 40 (1), 281–310. doi:10.3102/00028312040001281.
  27. Kostons, D., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning, Learning and Instruction, 22 (2), 121-132. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004.
  28. Kozikoğlu, İ. (2019). Analysis of the studies concerning flipped learning model: A comparative meta-synthesis study, International Journal of Instruction, 12 (1), 851-868. doi:10.29333/iji.2019.12155a.
  29. Lim, L. L. (2014). A case study on peer-teaching, Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 35–40. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.28006.
  30. Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten-ten, B. D., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2015). Developing young adolescents’ self-regulation by means of formative assessment: A theoretical perspective, Cogent Education, 2 (1), 1071233. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2015.1071233.
  31. Nerantzi, C. (2020). The use of peer instruction and flipped learning to support flexible blended learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 7 (2), 184-195. doi: 10.18646/2056.72.20-013.
  32. Norman, E., & Furnes, B. (2016). The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: Is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media?, Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.043.
  33. Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2018). Metacognition in schools: what does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools?, Educational Review, 71, 483 - 500. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127.
  34. Pintrich, P.R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students, Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.
  35. Pintrich, P.R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors, In Development of achievement motivation, edited by J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, 249-284. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  36. Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework, Journal of Advanced Academics, 22 (2), 194–218. doi:10.1177/1932202X1102200202.
  37. Rowley, N., & Green, J. (2015). Just-in-time teaching and peer instruction in the flipped classroom to enhance student learning, Education in Practice, 2 (1).
  38. Sciucca, D. S., & Fochi, V. (2016). Flipped classroom: The point of view of the students, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12 (3), 9-17. doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1101.
  39. Teng, F., & Reynolds, B. L. (2019). Effects of individual and group metacognitive prompts on EFL reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning, PloS one, 14 (5), e0215902. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215902.
  40. Valizadeh, M., & Soltanpour, F. (2020). The flipped pedagogy: effects on the grammatical competence and writing skill of basic users of English, International Journal of Instruction, 13 (3), 761-776. doi:10.29333/iji.2020.13351a.
  41. Voskamp, A., Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2020). Teaching practices for self-directed and self-regulated learning: Case studies in Dutch innovative secondary schools, Educational Studies. doi:10.1080/03055698.2020.1814699.
  42. Wang, C.H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning, Distance Education, 34 (3), 302-323. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.
  43. Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pino Pasternak, D., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: Role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6 (3), 433-455. doi:10.1891/194589507787382043.
  44. Wolters, C.A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning, Educational Psychologist, 38 (4), 189-205. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1.
  45. Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective, Educational Psychologist, 33 (2-3), 73-86. doi:10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292.
  46. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning, In Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications, edited by D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman, 1–30. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'