Main Article Content


The multicultural realities of modern society require an effective system to support the development and preservation of the heritage language of children growing and developing outside of their heritage culture. Digital technologies may come at hand to parents and educators who strive to create such a system for their bi/multilingual children.

This paper reports on the mixed methods research study that documented and analyzed attitude to and the usage of digital technologies by Russian-speaking parents raising bi-/multilingual children outside of Russia. Thirty-four participants from 12 countries completed an online questionnaire. Three native Russian mothers raising young Russian heritage language learners were also engaged into a case study.

The study revealed that parenting efforts could include speech development learning activities with traditional and digital learning tools. Participants expressed their favorable view on the educational value of digital (computer, mobile, online) technologies. In practice, parents’ usage of these tools was very limited as most of them preferred a printed book and live communication for maintaining Russian. It was obvious that many parents are not well informed about the availability of high-quality digital resources for the development of Russian speech in preschoolers and/or don't see their advantages. The results of the research confirmed studies that indicated the importance of creating the “child-digital resource-teacher” interaction and the need for mediation by an adult in a situation where a child interacts with a computer or tablet. These results are of practical significance for formal/informal bilingual educators, teacher training institutions and parents of bi/multilingual children.


Educational Technology Digital Learning Objects Multilingual Education Bilingual Education Russian Computer-Assisted Language Learning Teaching Language

Article Details

Author Biographies

Gulnara Sadykova, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Dept. of Romance-Germanic Philology

Associate Professor

Liliia Khalitova, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Dept. of Romance-Germanic Philology

Associate Professor

Albina Kayumova, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Dept. of Romance-Germanic Philology

Associate Professor

How to Cite
Sadykova, G., Khalitova, L., & Kayumova, A. (2021). Maintaining bilingualism through technologies: the case of young Russian heritage learners. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(3), 101-109.


  1. Brinton D. M., Kagan O., & Bauckus S. (2008). Heritage language education: A new field emerging. New York, NY, Routledge.
  2. Bus A. G., Takacs Z. K., & Kegel C. A. T. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 35, 79-97.
  3. Cho, S. P. (2008). Korean Immigrants’ Social Practice of Heritage Language Acquisition and Maintenance Through Technology. Doctoral dissertation. University of British Columbia.
  4. Cummins, J. (2008). Technology, literacy, and young second language learners: Designing educational futures. In L. Parker (Ed.) Technology-mediated Learning Environments for Young English Learners (pp. 61-98). New York, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Debski, R. (2019). Language transmission opportunities created through video recording in the family: a microanalysis. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(6), 741-753.
  6. Edwards, S. (2016). New concepts of play and the problem of technology, digital media and popular-culture integration with play-based learning in early childhood education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 513-532.
  7. Kayumova, A., & Sadykova, G. (2019). Implementing a multimodal online program for very young learners of Russian: Educators’ perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 1-13.
  8. Kheirkhah, M., & Cekaite, A. (2015). Language Maintenance in a Multilingual Family: Informal Heritage Language Lessons in Parent-Child Interactions. Multilingua, 34(3), 319-346.
  9. King, K. A., Kendall, A., & Fogle, L. (2006), Bilingual parenting as good parenting: Parents’ perspectives on family language policy for additive bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(6), 695-712.
  10. Li G., Ni X. (2013). Еffесts оf а Tесhnоlоgу-Еnriсhеd, Tаsk-Bаsеd Lаnguаgе Tеасhing Сurriсulum оn Сhinеsе Еlеmеntаrу Studеnts’ Асhiеvеmеnt in Еnglish аs а Fоrеign Lаnguаgе. Intеrnаtiоnаl Jоurnаl оf Соmputеr-Аssistеd Lаnguаgе Lеаrning аnd Tеасhing (IJСАLLT), 3(1), 33-49.
  11. Lohe, V., & Elsner, D. (2014). Developing language awareness in primary school children with multilingual virtual talking books: First results of the pilot study. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 4(4), 29-45.
  12. Mbakop, A. W. N., & Ndada, A. K. (2019). Multilingualism, beliefs about language, and language use in the family. International Journal of Multilingualism, DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2019.1678625.
  13. McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding Comics. New York, NY, Harper Collins.
  14. Meskill, C. (2007). Producerly texts: Implications for language in education. Journal of Language and Education, 21(2), 95-106.
  15. Meskill, C., & Mossop, J. (2000). Electronic texts in English to speakers of other languages classrooms. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly, 34(3), 585-592.
  16. Meskill, C., Sadykova, G., & Kayumova, A. (2020). Mediating Digital Screens with Very Young Emerging Bilinguals. Bilingual Research Journal, 43(2), 137-156.
  17. Morgan, L., & Peter, M. G. (2014). Affordances for home language maintenance created by multimodal Web 2.0 and mobile technologies. In International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education 2014 Proceedings (pp. 175-184), Kos, Greece.
  18. Pison, G. (2019). Which countries have the most immigrants? In World Economic Forum. Retrieved 10th March, 2021 from
  19. Plass, J. L., & Jones, L. C. (2005), Multimedia Learning in Second Language Acquisition. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 467-488). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.030.
  20. Rosen, D. B., & Jaruszewicz, C. (2009), Developmentally appropriate technology use and early childhood teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 30(2), 162-17.
  21. Roskos, K., Christie, J. (2001). Examining the play-literacy interface: A critical review and future directions. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(1), 59-89. DOI: 10.1177/14687984010011004.
  22. Russian diaspora (2020). Wikipedia. Retrieved March 10th, 2021 from
  23. Sadykova, G., Vafina, A., & Kayumova, A. (2018). Promoting dialogue of cultures in digital learning objects for young bilingual language learners. In 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN) (pp. 4948-4952), IATED, Spain.
  24. Sadykova, G., Khalitova, L., & Kayumova, A. (2019). Digital resources for the development of Russian speech and socio-cultural competencies of children. In Gelfreich, P.G. (Ed.) Bilingualism in the modern world (pp. 156-159), Universita di Parma, Italy.
  25. Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Effects of vocabulary training by computer in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 557-566.
  26. Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21(1), 17-27.
  27. Smeets, D., & Bus, A. (2014). The interactive animated e-book as a word learning device for kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1-22.
  28. Tеrrеll, S. S. (2011). Intеgrаting Оnlinе Tооls tо Mоtivаtе Уоung Еnglish Lаnguаgе Lеаrnеrs tо Prасtiсе Еnglish Оutsidе thе Сlаssrооm. Intеrnаtiоnаl Jоurnаl оf Соmputеr-Аssistеd Lаnguаgе Lеаrning аnd Tеасhing (IJСАLLT), 1(2), 16-24.
  29. Verdugo, D., & Belmonte, A. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87-101.
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Tool and Symbol in Child Development. In Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 19-30), Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.