Main Article Content


This paper concerns the design and implementation of a particular methodology for mathematics teaching/learning which exploits an interactive and immersive metaphor of storytelling. This research aims to promote processes such as inquiring, conjecturing, formalizing, proving in mathematics, and to investigate which is the best way to organize ICT tools to achieve that purpose. We also report the findings of an ongoing experimentation at the K12 school level.


Mathematics Education Digital Storytelling Collaborative Learning Moodle

Article Details

How to Cite
Albano, G., Coppola, C., Dello Iacono, U., Fiorentino, G., Pierri, A., & Polo, M. (2020). Technology to enable new paradigms of teaching/learning in mathematics: the digital interactive storytelling case. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(1), 65-71.


  1. Albano, G., Dello Iacono, U., & Fiorentino, G. (2016). An online Vygotskian learning activity model in mathematics. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS), v.12, n.3, pp. 159-169.
  2. Albano, G., & Dello Iacono, U. (2018). DIST-M: scripting collaboration for competence-based mathematics learning. In: Silverman J. Hoyos V. (eds). Distance Learning, E-Learning and Blended Learning of Mathematics, p. 115-131, Cham:Springer.
  3. Albano, G., & Dello Iacono, U. (2019a). GeoGebra in e-learning environments: a possible integration in mathematics and beyond. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(11), 4331-4343.
  4. Albano, G., & Dello Iacono, U. (2019b). A scaffolding toolkit to foster argumentation and proofs in Mathematics. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16:4, pp. 1-12.
  5. Albano, G., Pierri, A., & Polo, M. (2019). Engagement in mathematics through digital interactive storytelling. Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11, February 6 – 10, 2019).
  6. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G. Winters, F.I., Moos, D.C., & Greene, J.A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional science, 33(5-6), 2005, pp. 381-412.
  7. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In: J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  8. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA – London: Harvard University Press.
  9. Demetriadis, S., & Karakostas, A. (2008). Adaptive collaboration scripting: A conceptual framework and a design case study. In 2008 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (pp. 487-492). IEEE.
  10. Ferrari, P.L. (2004). Mathematical language and advanced mathematics learning.In Johnsen Hoines, M. & Berit Fugelstad, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of PME (pp. 383–390). Bergen, Norway.
  11. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13–37). New York: Springer.
  12. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hamalainen, R., Hakkinen, P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 211–224.
  13. Lazarou, D., Sutherland, R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 150–166.
  14. Liljedahl, P. (2007). Persona-based journaling: Striving for authenticity in representing the problem-solving process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 661-680.
  15. Mellone M., & Tortora R. (2015). Ambiguity as a cognitive and didactic resource. In Krainer K., Vondrová N. (Eds.), Proc. of CERME 9, Praga, pp. 1434-1439.
  16. Polo, M., Dello Iacono, U., Fiorentino, G., Pierri, A. (2019), A Social Network Analysis approach to a Digital Interactive Storytelling in Mathematics, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, v.15, n.3, 239-250.
  17. Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the learning of mathematics, 22(2), 14-23.
  18. Sfard, A. (2001). Learning mathematics as developing a discourse. In Proceedings of 21st Conference of PME-NA (pp. 23-44). Columbus, OH: Clearing House for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
  19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
  20. Zan, R. (2012). La dimensione narrativa di un problema: il modello C&D per l'analisi e la (ri)formulazione del testo. Parte I. L’insegnamento della matematica e delle scienze integrate. Vol.35 A N.2, 4, 2012.
  21. Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P. (2009). Teaching mathematics as storytelling. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.