Main Article Content


The knowledge, skills, and abilities that human capital offers create tangible and intangible assets that equip organizations to thrive. In particular, in today’s Industry 4.0 environment, training, recruiting, and retaining highly qualified ICT-ready professionals remains a problem for many organizations including educational, governmental, healthcare, and business organizations. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed the importance of digital assets to our economies, and it is also demonstrating that there is potentially a new digital divide with even worse implications for companies, economies, and society, which is threatening the resilience of business, governance, and society. In this paper, we respond to the question “how can we develop ICT human capital in our global economy in an equitable, inclusive, and purposeful manner such that not organizations thrive, but also to promote social justice and equity in our global economy?”


Human Capital Knowledge-based Economy ICT Open Ecuation

Article Details

How to Cite
Carbonaro, A., Moss Breen , J., & Piccinini, F. (2022). A new digital divide threatening resilience: exploring the need for educational, firm-based, and societal investments in ICT human capital. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 66-73.


  1. Abdurakhmanova, G., Shayusupova, N., Irmatova, A., & Rustamov, D. (2020). The role of the digital economy in the development of the human capital market. International Journal of Psychological Rehabilitation, 24(7), 8043-8051.
  2. Aluttis, C., Bishaw, T., & Frank, M. W. (2014). The workforce for health in a globalized context–global shortages and international migration. Global Health Action, 7(1), 23611.
  3. Andronico, A., Carbonaro, A., Colazzo, L., & Molinari, A. (2004). Personalisation services for learning management systems in mobile settings. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 14(4-5), 353-369.
  4. Bach, M. P., Zoroja, J., & Strugar, I. (2020). Investment of European enterprises in ICT education of their employees: Relationship with country competitiveness and digital economy development. In 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO) p. 658-663.
  5. Becker, G. S. (2002). Human capital. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, 2.
  6. Bonacini, L., Gallo, G., & Scicchitano, S. (2021). Working from home and income inequality: risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19. Journal of population economics, 34(1), 303-360.
  7. Burke B., D. Cearley, N. Jones, D. Smith, A. Chandrasekaran, C. K. Lu, and K. Panetta (2019) Gartner Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2020-Smarter with Gartner.
  8. Carbonaro, A. (2010). WordNet-based summarization to enhance learning interaction tutoring. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(2), 67-74.
  9. Carbonaro, A. (2019). Good practices to influence engagement and learning outcomes on a traditional introductory programming course. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(7), 919-926.
  10. Cockburn, A., Dragicevic, P., Besançon, L. & Gutwin, C. (2020) Threats of a replication crisis in empirical computer science. Commun. ACM 63, 70–79.
  11. Cotet, G.B.; Carutasu, N.L.; Chiscop, F. (2020) Industry 4.0 Diagnosis from an iMillennial Educational Perspective. Educ. Sci.10, 21
  12. Edelman Trust Barometer (2019) Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report. Barometer _Global_Report.pdf.
  13. European Commission. (2018). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Retrieved November 2, 2021 from
  14. Gunning D. (2017) Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
  15. Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and fighting knowledge-sharing hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 31(1), 60-73.
  16. ISO 24028:2020. (2020). Information Technology–Artificial Intelligence–Overview of Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, European Commission.
  17. Kaur, R., & Kaur, R. Portable Devices for E-Learning: Learn Anywhere Anytime. COVID–19: Crisis, Effects, Challenges and Innovations, 229.
  18. Kicová, M. (2019). Enterprise’s process innovations in the context of enterprise’s financial performance. Strategic Management, 2019, 24, 3–13
  19. Klochkova, E. N., Ledneva, O. V., Sadovnikova, N. A., Darda, E. S., & Oveshnikova, L. V. (2019). Human capital for digital education. Amazonia Investiga, 8(24), 28-37.
  20. Kowal J., & G. Paliwoda-Pękosz, (2017) ICT for global competitiveness and economic growth in emerging economies: Economic, cultural, and social innovations for human capital, Transition economies , pp. 304-307
  21. Kucharčíková, A. (2011). Human capital–definitions and approaches. Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 5(2), 60-70.
  22. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507.
  23. Loi, M., & Di Guardo, M. C. (2015). The third mission of universities: An investigation of the espoused values. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 855-870.
  24. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2021) NIST Proposes Method for Evaluating User Trust in Artificial Intelligence Systems.
  25. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
  26. Popkova, E. G., & Sergi, B. S. (2020). Human capital and AI in industry 4.0. Convergence and divergence in social entrepreneurship in Russia. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
  27. Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the Industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(10), 1-28.
  28. Šlaus, I., & Jacobs, G. (2011). Human capital and sustainability. Sustainability, 3(1), 97-154.
  29. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2021) Artificial Intelligence: An Accountability Framework for Federal Agencies and Other Entities.
  30. Wachter S., B. Mittelstadt, and C. Russell (2017) Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 31, 841.

Most read articles by the same author(s)