Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 6, 2023
Published
Oct 31, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 278 Download : 164

Main Article Content

Abstract

A new generation of higher education institutions need spaces designed to support interaction, collaboration, flexibility, social engagement, and the use of technology to make the youth competent for Industry 4.0. The learning spaces of Education 4.0 in Architecture colleges are unexplored; whether they also need the same type of spaces as other higher education institutes for 21st century pedagogy, is yet to be determined. The aim of this research is to find out the change required in formal and informal learning spaces in architecture colleges with the new trend of learning and skills required in Architecture Education. The research methodology adopted here is the case study research approach, together with the tools of survey and interview. A comparative analysis of the learning spaces in four architectural institutions in north India is done on the basis of flexibility, integration of technology and interactive social spaces. A further survey of 150 students and 75 teachers, were conducted to understand the preference of types of learning spaces of the users. The conclusion specifies that there is an equal need for both formal and informal learning spaces to enhance the learning of the students, and changes are required in the formal and informal learning spaces to incorporate these three factors of flexibility, integration of technology, and interactive social spaces for empowering youth with skills for fourth Industrial Revolution. This research will assist architects in creating a better learning environment for the Education 4.0 and future architects.

Keywords

Learning Spaces Architecture Colleges Innovative learning environments Education 4.0

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Kansal, R., & Bassi, P. (2023). Adapting design of Learning Spaces for Education 4.0: a case of architectural institutions in India. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 19(3), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135863

References

  1. Abdullah, N.A.G., Beh, S.C., Tahir, M.M., Che Ani, A.I. & Tawil, N.M. (2011). Architecture design studio and learning spaces: a holistic approach to the design and planning of learning facilities. Procedia social and behavioural sciences, Vol.15, 27-32.
  2. Anireddy, S., Mantri, A., & prit Kaur, D. (2022). Designing a Framework to Improve the Learning Experience for Middle School Students in Geographical Education. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 6157.
  3. Baburaj, A. S., & Mukherjee, M. (2011). Nex Gen Learning Environments. Architecture- Time Space and People, June, 16-23.
  4. Bennett (2006). Designing for uncertainty. Retrieved from www.libraryspaceplanning.com/assets/resource/designing foruncertainity.pdf
  5. Benoit, A. (2012). Formal and Informal Learning Spaces: Part 1. Retrieved from http://www.lc2.ca/item/73-formal-and-informal-learning-spaces-part-1
  6. Bhandari, H., Tandon, U., Bansal, K., & Mittal, A. (2020, December). Barriers to the adoption of technology in learning and assessment of undergraduate architecture students. International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing and Technologies (3ICT), 1-5. IEEE.
  7. Broodryk, J. (2015). Pedagogies that support Flexible Learning Environments. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/content/download/73016/600409/file/Jaco%20Broodryk%20%20flexible-%20learning-%20environment
  8. Brooks, D.C. (2012). Space and consequences: the impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behaviour. Journal of learning spaces. Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/
  9. Brown, M. (2005). Learning Spaces. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/educating-net-generation/learning-spaces
  10. Casakin, H., & Davidovitch, N. (2013). Learning spaces and social climate in architectural education: Design studio vs. traditional classroom. International conference on engineering and product design education, pp. 862-870. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institute of Technology.
  11. Casanova, D. & Mitchell, P. (2017). The cube and the poppy flower: Participatory approaches for designing technology-enhanced learning spaces. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6 (3), 1-12.
  12. Chism, V.N.N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. Learning spaces. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces
  13. Crook, C. & Witcomb, G.L. (2012). Ambience in social learning: student engagement with new design for learning spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 121-139.
  14. Deed, C. & Alterator, S. (2017). Informal learning spaces and their impact on learning in higher education: Framing new narratives of participation. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 54-58.
  15. Department of Education and Training. Victoria., (2004). Linking pedagogy and space. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/documents/school/principal /infrastructure/ pedagogyspace.pdf
  16. Diittoe, W. (2006). Seriously cool places: The future of learning centred built environments. Learning spaces. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces
  17. Evaluation and Education Policy Analysis. Pennsylvania (2015). The importance of school facilities in improving student outcomes. Retrieved from http://sites.psu.edu/ceepa/2015/06/07/the-importance-of-school-facilities-in-improving-student-outcomes/
  18. Foster, N. F. & Gibbons, S. (2007). Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester. Chicago: Association of College Research libraries.
  19. Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environment Research, 13(2), 127-145.
  20. Granito, V. & Santana, M. (2016). Psychology of learning spaces: Impact on Teaching and Learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(1), 1-8.
  21. Head, A. (2016). Project information literacy: Planning and designing academic library learning spaces. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org
  22. Hill, J. (2013). Spaces for learning. Retrieved from http://worldarchitects.com/
  23. Horne, S.V., Murniati, C., Gaffney, J.D.H. & Jasse, M. (2012). Promoting Active learning in Technology infused TILE classroom at the University of Iowa. Journal of learning spaces, 1(2). Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/
  24. Islam, M. A. (2022). Industry 4.0: Skill set for employability. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100280
  25. Jamieson, P., Gilding, T. & Trevitt, A.C.F. (2000). Place and space in the design of new learning environments. Higher Education Research and Development, 19( 2), 221-237.
  26. JISC Developmental group, Bristol (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design.
  27. Jain, A. K. (2016). Future of Architecture Education. Architecture- Time Space and People, April, 28-35
  28. Kuuskorpi, M. & Cabellos, N. (2011). The future of the physical learning environment: school facilities that support the user. CELE Exchange 2011/11– ISSN 2072-7925 – OECD 2011. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/innovation education/centreforeffectivelearningenvironmentscele/49167890.pdf
  29. Lippincott, J. K. (2006). Linking the Information Commons to Learning. LearningSpaces. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces
  30. Lippman, P. C. (2010). Can the Physical Environment have an impact on the learning Environment? CELE Exchange 2010/13 - ISSN 2072-7925 - OECD 2010. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/innovationeducation/centreforeffectivelearning environmentscele/46413458.pdf
  31. Lomas, C. (2005). Design of the Learning Space: Learning and Design Principles. Educause Review, 40 (4), 16–28.
  32. Lomas, C. & Oblinger, D. (2006). Student practices and their impact on learning spaces. Learning Spaces. EDUCAUSE e book. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces
  33. Lueth, P.L. (2008). The architectural design studio as a learning environment. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd
  34. Macphee, L. (2009). Learning Spaces. Educause Quarterly, 32(1), Retrieved from http://www2.nau.edu/lrm22/learning_spaces
  35. Malewar, S. & Peshwe, S. (2016). Architecture and human psychology. Architecture- Time Space and People, 18-27
  36. Matthews, K., Andrews, V. & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360. 2010.512629
  37. Mohapatra, T. (2012). Better learning environment. Architecture- Time Space and People, December, 16-23
  38. Molnar, F. (1925). Life at Bauhaus. Retrieved from https://www.bauhaus.de/en /das_bauhaus/46_ leben_am _bauhaus/
  39. Neill, S. & Rebecca, E. (2008). Flexible learning spaces: the integration of pedagogy, physical design, and instructional technology. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6c5c/23a05b26d2e3cceb80ee788c0c8dac68037d.pdf
  40. Newton, C. (2011). Innovative learning spaces. Artichoke, June, 35. Retrieved from https://architectureau.com/articles/innovative-learning-spaces/
  41. Obeidat, A. & Share, R. A. (2012). Quality learning environments: design studio classroom. Asian Culture and history, 4 (2), July, 165-174. Retrieved from www. Ccsenet.org/ach
  42. Oblinger, G. D. (2006). Learning spaces. Educause e book. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces
  43. Painter, S., Fournier, J., Grape, C., Grummon, P., Morelli, J., Whitmer, S. & Cevetello, J. (2012). Research on learning space design: Present state and future directions. Report from the recipients of the 2012 Perry Chapman Prize. Retrieved from https://www.acmartin.com/sites/default/files/LearningSpaceDesign-L_0.pdf
  44. Pak, B. & Verbeke, J. (2012). Design studio 2.0: augmenting reflective architectural design learning. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 17, 502- 519. Retrieved from www.itcon.org.
  45. Pearlman, B. (2012). Designing New learning environments to support 21st century skills. 21st century skills, Chapter-6, pp.116-147. Retrieved from http://www.designshare.com/images/chap6_designing_newlearningenvironments.Pdf
  46. Perk, T., Orr, D. & Alomari, E. (2016). Classroom Re-design to Facilitate Student Learning: A Case Study of Changes to a University Classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 53-68. Doi: 10.14434/josotl.v16i1.19190
  47. Radcliffe, D. (2009). A Pedagogy-Space-Technology (PST) Framework for Designing and Evaluating Learning Places: Learning Spaces in Higher Education. Australia: University of Queensland. Retrieved from http://www.uq.edu.au/nextgenerationlearningspace/UQ%20Next%20Generation%20Book.pdf
  48. Radcliffe, D., Wilson, H., Powell, O. & Tibbetts, B. (2009). Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcome by design. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
  49. Raizada, S. (2014). Hidden Curriculum Model of Teaching Architectural Design- A Non-Conventional approach. Journal of Council of Architecture, 1, 51-64.
  50. Randall, M. & Wilson, G. (2009). Making it my street: The Bond University ‘street’ area. Proceedings of the next generation learning spaces, University of Queensland: Brisbane, 107-110.
  51. Sanders, G. (2011). What makes a good classroom? Retrieved from http://uplan.uoregon.edu/Research/whatmakesagoodclassroom2011.pdf.
  52. Shaw, A. (2017). How Flexible Learning Spaces Support Student Learning. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-flexible-learning-spaces-support-student-anne-shaw/
  53. Smith, C. (2017). The Influence of Hierarchy and Layout Geometry in the Design of Learning Spaces. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6 (3), 59-67.
  54. Vale, J. (2015). Innovative design for learning spaces. Proceedings of INTED 2015 Conference, pp.7033-7040. Madrid, Spain.
  55. Whiteside, A., Brooks, D.C. & Walker, J. (2010). Making the Case for Space: Three Years of Empirical Research on Learning Environments. EDUCAUSE, Quaterly, 33(3).
  56. Wierman, M. (2016). 4 key elements of 21st century classroom design. Retrieved from http://www.gettingsmart.com/2016/12/21st-century-classroom-design/
  57. Wozniak, M. (2016). How to Improve Architectural Education: Learning (and Unlearning) From the Beaux Arts Method. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/785820/how-to-improve-architectural-education-learning-and-unlearning-from-the-beaux-arts-method.
  58. Zandvliet, D. (2017). Spaces for learning: development and validation of the School Physical and Campus Environment Survey. Learning Environments Research. 20(2), 175–187.