Main Article Content


The fourth industrial revolution is expected to deeply affect the Indian socio-economic trends. Higher education is gradually acquiring significance in the agenda of development and cooperation policies. In the last decade, the European Union has supported Indian higher education institutions to enhance their role in the development of the country. The Erasmus+ has been revised to intertwine the internal and external dimensions, embedding goals related to social, political and economic spheres. To pursue this goal, under the Erasmus+ Capacity Building in Higher Education action, the EU has allowed Indian universities to ideate and develop projects addressing local needs and global challenges. Through case study and participant observation, the article assesses the EU's action in India for cooperation development initiatives engaging the Indian higher education sector. The research findings have been instrumental in delivering targeted recommendations to European policymakers to enhance the impact of the EU developmental cooperation policy in India and the EU-India relations tout court.


EU Development Policy EU-India Relations Capacity Building Higher Education Studies Fourth Industrial Revolution

Article Details

How to Cite
Greco, S. (2023). The Impact of the EU Development Policy in Indian Higher Education: the EDUREFOM Project and the Socio-economic Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution as a Case Study. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 19(3), 11-18.


  1. Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, Piscataway, AldineTransation.
  2. Gebhard, C. (2017). The Problem of Coherence in the European Union’s International Relations’, in C. Hill, M. Smith & S. Vanhoonacker (eds.), International Relations and the European Union, 3rd ed., 123–142, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  3. European Commission (2013). European Higher Education in the World, Communication from the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2013) 499 final, 11th July, Brussels, European Commission.
  4. European Commission (2018). 2019 annual work programme for the implementation of “Erasmus+”: the Union Programme for Education, Training, Youth and Sport, Implementing decision, C (2018) 6572, 11th October, Brussels, European Commission.
  5. European Commission (2020). Erasmus+ Programme Guide, Version 3, 25th August, Brussels, European Commission.
  6. European Commission (2021). The Global Gateway, Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, JOIN(2021) 30 final, 1st December, Brussels, European Commission.
  7. Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future, London, Basic Books.
  8. Ford, M. (2021). Rule of the Robots. How Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Everything, London, Basic Books.
  9. Frey C. B. & Osborne M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(c), 254–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
  10. Gillham B. (2001). Case study research methods, London, Continuum.
  11. Graetz, G. & Michaels, G. (2015). Robots at work: the impact on productivity and jobs, 447, 12–15, Centre for Economic Performance, London, London School of Economics.
  12. Greco, S. (2022), The Role of Higher Education in the EU Development Cooperation Policy, in N. Inamdar & P. Kirloskar, Reimagining Border in Cross-border Education, 237–259, Manipal, Manipal Universal Press.
  13. Johansson R. (2005). On Case Study Methodology, in D. U. Vestbro, Y. Hurol & N. Wilkinson (eds.), Methodologies in Housing Research, 30–39, Gateshead, The Urban International Press.
  14. Keynes, J. M. (1931/2010). Essays in Persuasion, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Manda, M. I. & Ben Dhaou, S. (2019). Responding to the challenges and opportunities in the 4th Industrial Revolution in developing countries, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 244–253, Melbourne, RMIT University and United Nations University.
  16. McKinsey (2017). Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation, New York, McKinsey & Company.
  17. OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2017). The Next Production Revolution Implications for Governments and Business, Paris, OECD Publishing.
  18. OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2022), European Union institutions, Development Co-operation Profiles, 1–18, Paris, OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/c0ad1f0d-en
  19. Schwandt, T.A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  20. Seib, P. M. (2012). Real-time diplomacy: Politics and power in the social media era, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. Sharp, K. (1998). The case for case studies in nursing research: the problem of generalization. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(4), 785–789. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00604.x
  22. Spitz-Oener, A., (2006). Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: Looking outside the wage structure. Journal of labor economics, 24(2), 235–227. DOI: 10.1086/499972
  23. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, New York, Crown Business.
  24. UBS – Union Bank of Switzerland (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. UBS White Paper for the World Economic Forum, Zürich, Union Bank of Switzerland.
  25. United Nations (2015), Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, 25th September, New York, United Nations.
  26. Wojciuk, A. (2018). Higher education as a soft power in international relations. In Y. Watanabe (ed.), Handbook of cultural security, 343–360, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  27. Wojciuk, A., Michałek, M. & Stormowska, M. (2015). Education as a source and tool of soft power in international relations, European Political Science, 14(1), 298–317. DOI: 10.1057/eps.2015.25
  28. World Economic Forum (2016). The future of jobs: employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution, Geneva, World Economic Forum.
  29. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  30. Zervoudi, E. V. (2020). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities, Challenges, and Proposed Policies, in A. Grau and Z. Wang, Industrial Robotics – New Paradigms, 3–28, London, IntechOpen.