Main Article Content


Access to education and training has been a growing concern to different international organizations, and the concern for socially vulnerable groups at risk of exclusion, such as the prison population, in particular, has been increasingly evident. In this context, and assuming that education and training in prisons must have a similar degree of demand as regular educational institutions, Online Education, mediated by digital platforms, is an opportunity for inmates to acquire knowledge and skills. In fact, the integration of digital platforms in the context of imprisonment can be a very appropriate tool to revitalize the educational experience. It is precisely the creation of learning environments enriched with audiovisual technologies that we intend to analyse, describing their impact on the creation and development of a virtual learning community, based on the qualitative analysis of the perceptions and narratives of seventeen students attending Higher Education in prisons and having as reference the pedagogical models developed by Garrison et al. (2000) and Moreira (2017). The results show that the design of the online environment anchored in these models and in the use of audiovisual technologies can have very positive effects in the creation and development of virtual learning communities in higher education in prison context.


Education in Prisons Audiovisual Technologies Online Learning Virtual Learning Communities

Article Details

How to Cite
Dias-Trindade, S., & Moreira, J. A. (2020). Online Learning Environments enriched with audiovisual technologies and its impact on the construction of virtual communities in Higher Education in prison context. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(2), 09-16.


  1. Altrichter, H., Posch, P. & Somekh, B. (1996). Teachers investigate their work: an introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.
  2. Bardin, L. (1977), L´analyse de contenu, Paris, PUF.
  3. Bolívar, A. (2012). Justicia social y equidad escolar: una revisión actual, Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS). 1(1). 9-45.
  4. Cassel, C. & Johnson, P. (2006). Action Research: Explaining the Diversity. London: Sage Publications.
  5. Connell, R. W. (2012). Schools and social justice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  6. Dias-Trindade, S., & Carvalho, J. (2019). História, tecnologias digitais e mobile learning. Coimbra: IUC. DOI:
  7. Dias-Trindade, S., & Moreira, J. A. (2019). Pedagogical scenarios enriched with audiovisual technologies and their impact on the promotion of the learning skills of inmate students in Portugal. Digital Education Review. 35, June. 97-110. DOI:
  8. Duarte, R. (2002). Cinema & Educação. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.
  9. Eden, C. & Huxham, C. (1996). Action Research for management research. Journal of Management. Vol. 7. 75-86. DOI:
  10. European Commission (2003). Comunicação da Comissão ao Conselho, Parlamento Europeu, Comité Económico e Social e Comité das Regiões – Relatório Final sobre o eEurope2002 [COM (2003) 66 final]. Bruxels: Serviço de Publicações da Comissão Europeia.
  11. European Commission (2005), eEurope – uma sociedade da informação para todos. Bruxels: Serviço de Publicações da Comissão Europeia.
  12. Faerber, R. (2002). Le groupe d'apprentissage en formation à distance: ses caractéristiques dans un environnement virtuel. In Larose, F. & Karsenti, T. (Eds.) La Place des TIC dans la Formation Initiale et Continue (pp. 99-128). Sherbrooke: Editions du CRP.
  13. Garrison, D. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. New York: Routledge Falmer.
  14. Garrison, D., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text- Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2(2-3). 87-105. DOI:
  15. Garrison, D. R. & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of Inquiry Framework: Review, Issues, and Future Directions. The Internet and Higher Education. 10(3). 157-172. DOI:
  16. Henri, F. & Basque, J. (2003). Conception d'activités d'apprentissage collaboratif en monde virtuel. In Deaudelin, C. & Nault, T. (Eds.). Collaborer pour apprendre et faire apprendre (pp. 29-52). Saint-Foy: PUQ Marcotte.
  17. Hobhouse, L. T. (1992). The elements of social justice. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
  18. Honneth, A. (2010). Reconocimiento y menosprecio. Sobre la fundamentación normativa de una teoría social. Madrid: Katz Editores.
  19. Hurtado, C. N. (2005). Educación popular: una mirada de conjunto, Decisio, Pátzcuaro. jan-apr. 3-14.
  20. McNiff, J. & Whitehead, J. (2009). Doing and writing action research. California: Sage Publications.
  21. Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20-30. DOI:
  22. Moore, J., Dickson-Deane, C. & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education. 14(2). 129-135. DOI:
  23. Moreira, J. A. (2017). A pedagogical model to deconstruct moving pictures in virtual learning environments and its impact on the self-concept of postgraduate students. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society. 13(1). 77-90. DOI:
  24. Moreira, J. A. & Almeida, A. C. (2011). How reliable and consistent is our learning community of inquiry? Psychometric qualities of the community of inquiry survey instrument applied to a sample of higher education Portuguese students. In EduLearn 2011. International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 4th-6th July 2011 – Barcelona (Spain).
  25. Murillo, J. & Hernández, R. (2011). Hacia un concepto de justicia social. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación. 9(4). 8-23.
  26. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 6(1). 21-40.
  27. Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating. The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan Page.
  28. Thiollent, M. (2005). Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
  29. Vala, J. (1986). A análise de conteúdo. In Silva, A. & Pinto, J. (Orgs.). Metodologia das Ciências Sociais. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
  30. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. New Jersey: Princeton University.