Main Article Content
This study increased the insights on child mediation by investigating whether and how adolescents use child mediation strategies in the context of their parents’ sharenting behavior and how this is related with family conflict. The results of a survey among adolescents confirmed their use of active, restrictive, and supervising child mediation strategies in the context of sharenting. Sharenting frequency of both mothers and fathers was associated with increased use of restrictive strategies. For mothers, it appeared that sharenting frequency directly and indirectly predicted more family conflict about sharenting via restrictive child mediation. For fathers, no significant effects were found from sharenting frequency on conflict about sharenting.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.
The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.
For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code
- Ammari, T., Kumar, P., Lampe, C., & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). Managing children’s online identities: How parents decide what to disclose about their children online. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Korea). 1895–1904.
- Beyens, I., & Beullens, K. (2017). Parent–child conflict about children’s tablet use: The role of parental mediation. New Media & Society, 19(12), 2075–2093.
- Beyens, I., & Valkenburg, P.M. (2019). Parental media mediation in adolescence: A comparative study of parent and adolescent reports. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(4), 716-736.
- Brehm, S.S., & Brehm, J.W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press.
- Brosch, A. (2016). When the child is born into the Internet: Sharenting as a growing trend among parents on Facebook. The New Educational Review, 43(1), 225–235.
- Chen, V.H.H., & Chng, G.S. (2016). Active and restrictive parental mediation over time: Effects on youths' self-regulatory competencies and impulsivity. Computers & Education, 98, 206-212.
- Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2019). Reducing harm from media: A meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173-193.
- Correa, T. (2012). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: How children influence their parents in the adoption and use of digital media (Dissertation). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/22115/CORREADISSERTATION-2012.pdf?sequence=1
- Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64, 103–124.
- Correa, T., Straubhaar, J.D., Spence, J., & Chen, W. (2013). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents’ usage of the Internet. New Media & Society, 17, 483–500.
- Davidson-Wall, N. (2018). “Mum, seriously!” Sharenting the new social trend with no opt-out. Debating communities and social networks 2018 OUA conference (Australia). 1–11.
- Davis, M.M., Clark, S.J., Singer, D.C., Matos-Moreno, A., Kauffman, A.D., & Hale, K. (2015). Parents on social media: Likes and dislikes of sharenting. C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health, 23(2).
- De Mol, J., & Buysse, A. (2018). The phenomenology of children’s influence on parents. Journal of Family Therapy, 30(2), 163-193.
- Duggan, M., Lenhart, A., Lampe, C., & Ellison, N.B. (2015). Parents and social media. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://gradelevelreading.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Role-of-Media-in-Supporting-Parent-Success-Pre-Readings-Combined.pdf
- Eisenberg A. (1992). Conflicts between mothers and their children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(1), 21–43.
- Hiniker, A., Schoenebeck, S.Y., & Kientz, J.A. (2016). Not at the dinner table: Parents’ and children’s perspectives on family technology rules. Conference on computer supported cooperative work (USA). 1376–1389.
- Ito, M.H. Horst, M. Bittanti, D. Boyd, R. Herr-Stephenson, P. Lange, C. Pascoe, & L. Robinson. (2008). Living and learning with new media. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
- Ivan, L., & Nimrod, G. (2021). Family conflicts and technology use: The voices of grandmothers. Family Relations, 70(1), 104-119.
- Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(4), 323-351.
- Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children's internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3(4), 394- 409.
- Krämer, N.C., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-ssteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(3), 106–116.
- Kumar, P., & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). The modern day baby book: Enacting good mothering and stewarding privacy on Facebook. ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (Canada). 1302–1312.
- Leaver, T. (2020). Balancing privacy: Sharenting, inti- mate surveillance and the right to be forgotten. In L. Green, D. Holloway, K. Stevenson, T. Leaver, & L. Had- don (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital media and children. London: Routledge.
- Lee, D. G. (2018). Parental verbal mediation for children's Internet use. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Capstones. 72. https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/tdc/72
- Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E.J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599.
- Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., & Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and technology use. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from https://heartmdinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/PIP_TeensandTechnology2013.pdf
- Marasli, M., Suhendan, E., Yilmazturk, N.H., & Figen, C. (2016). Parents’ shares on social networking sites about their children: Sharenting. Anthropologist, 24(2), 399–406.
- McLeod, J., & Brown, J. (1976). The family environment and adolescent television use. In J. Brown (Ed.), Children and Television. London: Collier MacMillan.
- Mesch, G.S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(4), 473–495.
- Morris, M.R. (2014). Social networking site use by mothers of young children. ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (USA). 1272–1282.
- Nathanson, A.I. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology 4(2), 207–230.
- Nelissen, S., & Van den Bulck, J. (2018). Expanding the unidirectional view on parental television mediation: Children’s guidance of their parent’s television use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(2), 232-250.
- Nelissen S, Kuczynski L, Coenen L, et al. (2019). Bidirectional socialization: an actor-partner interdependence model of internet self-efficacy and digital media influence between parents and children. Communication Research, 46, 1552–3810.
- Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media, and Technology, 31, 181–202.
- Ouvrein, G., & Verswijvel, K. (2019). Sharenting: Parental adoration or public humiliation? A focus group study on adolescents’ experiences with sharenting against the background of their own impression management. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 319–327.
- Perry, M. S., & Werner-Wilson, R. J. (2011). Couples and computer-mediated com- munication: A closer look at the affordances and use of the channel. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 120–134.
- Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behaviour among adolescents. Computers in Human Behaviour, 33, 32–38.
- Schrodt, P., Ledbetter, A.M., Jernberg, K.A., Larson, L., Elledge, N., & Glonek, K. (2009). Family communication patterns as mediators of communication competence in the parent-child relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(6-7), 853–874.
- Sharaievska, I., & Stodolska, M. (2017). Family satisfaction and social networking leisure. Leisure Studies, 36(2), 231–243.
- Steinberg, L. (2013). Adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Steinberg, L., & Morris, A.S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 83–110.
- Valkenburg, P.M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A.L., & Marseille, N.M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52–66.
- Van den Bulck, J., Custers, K., & Nelissen, S. (2016). The child-effect in the new media environment: Challenges and opportunities for communication research. Journal of Media and Children, 10, 30–38.
- Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). Parental guidance of children’s media use and conflict in the family. In B. Van den Bergh & J. Van den Bulck (Eds.), Children and media (pp. 131–150). Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
- Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2005). Chapter 2: The child effect in media and communication research: A call to arms and an agenda for Research. Communication Yearbook, 29(1), 35–47.
- Van Rompaey, V., Roe, K., & Struys, K. (2002). Children’s influence on Internet access at home: Adoption and use in the family context. Information, Communication & Society, 5(2), 189–206.
- Vaterlaus, J.M., Beckert, T.E., Tulane, S., & Bird, C.V. (2014). ‘‘They always ask what I’m doing and who I’m talking to’’: Parental mediation of adolescent interactive technology use. Marriage and Family Review, 50(8), 691–713
- Verswijvel, K., Walrave, M., Hardies, K., & Heirman, W. (2019). Sharenting, is it a good or a bad thing? Understanding how adolescents think and feel about sharenting on social network sites. Children and Youth Services Review, 104, 104401.
- Wagner, A., & Gasche, L.A. (2018). Sharenting: Making decisions about other’s privacy on social networking sites. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (Germany). 977–988.
- Wisniewski, P., Jia, H., Xu, H., Rosson, M.B., & Carroll, J.M. (2015). “Preventative” vs. “reactive”: How parental mediation influences teens’ social media privacy behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Canada), 302–316.