Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 10, 2025
Published
May 10, 2025
Download
PDF DATA
Statistic
Read Counter : 43 Download : 70

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines teachers’ competencies in evaluating digital content and tackling disinformation through analysis of pre-test data from 243 Italian primary and secondary school teachers participating in a media literacy training program. Drawing on the DigComp 2.2 framework, we assessed seven key digital literacy competencies, including source evaluation, social media verification, and visual literacy. Our findings reveal significant gaps between teachers' digital engagement patterns and their critical evaluation skills, particularly in visual content assessment. Using cluster analysis, we identified four distinct teacher profiles: Skeptical and Vulnerable Teachers, Traditional Trust-Based and Uncritical Teachers, Digitally Engaged and Trusting Teachers, and Balanced Critical Evaluators. The results show that teachers are moderately good at finding assertive signs of reliability, but they have trouble with more difficult “inferred context” tasks, especially when it comes to judging visual content. The study shows that different types of professional development are needed and suggests specific ways to help teachers improve their media literacy skills in a world where digital information is getting more complicated.

Keywords

Information Literacy Teachers Digital Skills Digital Content Disinformation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Bruno, N., De Santis, A., & Moriggi, S. (2025). Teachers competencies in evaluating digital sources and tackling disinformation: implications for media literacy education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 21(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1136182

References

  1. Bak-Coleman, J., Alfano, M., Barfuss, W., & Schoch, D. (2021). Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(5), 706-715.
  2. Bartholomew, D.J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith, J.I. (2008). Analysis of multivariate social science data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton (FL): CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  3. Bateman, J., & Jackson, D. (2024). Countering disinformation effectively: An evidence-based policy guide. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available here: https://carnegieendowment.org/2024/01/31/countering-disinformation-effectively-evidence-based-policy-guide-pub-91476.
  4. Bennett, W. L., Livingston, S., & Segerberg, A. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122-139.
  5. Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Wineburg, S., Rapaport, A., Carle, J., Garland, M., & Saavedra, A. (2021). Students’ Civic Online Reasoning: A National Portrait. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 505-515.
  6. Bruno, N., Bellini, C. (2023). La disinformazione nell’era digitale: le iniziative dell’Unione Europea per la formazione dei docenti. New literacies – nuovi linguaggi e nuove competenze - Atti del Convegno SIREM 2023. Scholé (in the process of being published).
  7. Common Sense Media. (2022). The Common Sense Census: Media use by tweens and teens. Common Sense Media. Available here: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research.
  8. Dame Adjin-Tettey, T. (2022). Combating fake news, disinformation, and misinformation: Experimental evidence for media literacy education. Cogent arts & humanities, 9(1), 2037229.
  9. Erdem, Cahit & Eristi, Bahadır. (2018). Paving the Way for Media Literacy Instruction in Preservice Teacher Education: Prospective Teachers' Levels of Media Literacy Skills. International Journal of Instruction. 11. 795-810.
  10. Eugeni, R. (2015). La condizione postmediale. ELS La Scuola.
  11. European Commission. (2022a). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens.
  12. European Commission. (2022b). Final report of the Commission expert group on tackling disinformation and promoting digital literacy through education and training. Available here: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/283100.
  13. European Commission. (2022c). Guidelines for teachers and educators on tackling disinformation and promoting digital literacy through education and training. Available here: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a224c235-4843-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
  14. Farné, R. (2021). Pedagogia visuale. Un’introduzione. Raffaello Cortina.
  15. Gee, J. P. (2007). What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. St. Martin’s Press, LLC.
  16. Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6-30.
  17. Gross, E.-C., & Balaban, D. C. (2024). The Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention on Countering Disinformation Moderated by Intellectual Humility. Media and Communication, 13.
  18. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex (GB): Pearson.
  19. Hebbar, N., Wolf, C. (2024). Determining trustworthiness through provenance and context. Google Policy Paper. Available here: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/publicpolicy.google/it//resources/determining_trustworthiness_en.pdf.
  20. Huang, G., Jia, W., & Yu, W. (2024). Media Literacy Interventions Improve Resilience to Misinformation: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Overall Effect and Moderating Factors. Communication Research, 0(0).
  21. ICILS (2018). International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018. Iea website. Available here: https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/icils/2018
  22. IDMO (2023). Digital Media Literacy Gaps and Needs. Available here: https://www.idmo.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/IDMO-Digital-Media-Literacy-Gaps-and-Needs_EN_final_compressed.pdf.
  23. Ipsos Mori (2021). Online media literacy: Across the world, demand for training is going unmet. Ipsos website. Available here: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/online-media-literacy-across-world-demand-training-going-unmet.
  24. Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371-388.
  25. Kopecký, K., Voráč, D., Szotkowski, R., Krejčí, V., Mackenzie, K., & Ramos-Navas-Parejo, M. (2023). Teachers in a world of information: Detecting false information. Profesional de la Informacion, 32(5).
  26. Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S. M., Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Hertwig, R., ... & Wineburg, S. (2024). Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour, 1-9.
  27. Livingstone, S. (2012). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. Communication and Society, 14(3), 1-17.
  28. Manovich, L. (2001). Post-media Aesthetics. Available here: https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/post-media-aesthetics.
  29. Martini, C. et al (2024). Disinformazione a scuola. Report 2024. Available here: https://www.unisr.it/attachments/Disinformazione-a-scuola---Report-/1ad3ac0a-e713-4d6c-a8f6-45dd3b421e86/6467a213-0ae0-4dea-8e5f-762e00738f22.pdf.
  30. McGowan-Kirsch, A. M., Palacios, A., & Rissman, M. (2023). Educating emerging citizens: Media literacy as a tool for combating the spread of image-based misinformation. Communication Teacher, 37(1), 27-38.
  31. McLuhan, M. (1970). Education in the electronic age. Interchange 1, 1–12 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214876
  32. McNelly, T. A., & Harvey, J. (2021). Media literacy instruction in today’s classrooms: A study of teachers’ knowledge, confidence, and integration. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 13(1), 108-130.
  33. Moriggi, S. (2023) (a cura di). Postmedialità. Società ed Educazione. Raffaello Cortina.
  34. Nygren, T., & Ecker, U. K. (2024). Education as a countermeasure against disinformation. Available here: https://www.psychologicaldefence.lu.se/sites/psychologicaldefence.lu.se/files/2024-11/Education%20as%20a%20countermeasure%20against%20disinformation_Eng.pdf.
  35. OECD (2018). Teaching in Focus #28. How teachers update their teaching skills to cope with the rapidly changing world, OECD website. Available here: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2019/09/how-teachers-update-their-teaching-skills-to-cope-with-the-rapidly-changing-world_77422986/282b9edd-en.pd
  36. Pérez-Escolar, M., Lilleker, D., & Tapia-Frade, A. (2023). A systematic literature review of the phenomenon of disinformation and misinformation. Media and communication, 11(2), 76-87.
  37. Ranieri, M., Bruni, I., & Orban de Xivry, A. C. (2017). Teachers’ professional development on digital and media literacy. Research on Education and Media, 9(2), 10-19.
  38. Ranieri, M., Luciani, S., & Ciampa, M. (2021). Developing media literacy and data literacy among teachers. Media and Communication, 9(2), 5-18.
  39. Rivoltella, P. C. (2020). Nuovi alfabeti. Educazione e culture nella società post-mediale. Scholé.
  40. Roozenbeek, J., Culloty, E., & Suiter, J. (2023). Countering misinformation. European Psychologist, Vol 28(3).
  41. Springer, S., & Özdemir, V. (2022). Disinformation as COVID-19's twin pandemic: False equivalences, entrenched epistemologies, and causes-of-causes. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 26(2), 82-87.
  42. Svimez (2024). Rapporto Svimez 2024. L’Economia e la Società del Mezzogiorno. Svimez website. Available here https://www.svimez.it/rapporto-svimez-2024/.
  43. Tan, D., & Nagappan, R. (2024). Pedagogical Strategies in Media Literacy Education and their Alignment with Student-Centered Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.
  44. TeaMLit Project. (2023). Media Literacy in Teacher Education: Comparative Report. Available here: https://teamlit.eu/publications/
  45. Tsankova, S., Angova, S., Nikolova, M., Valchanov, I., Valkov, I., & Minev, G. (2023). The Media Literacy and the Teachers. Pedagogika-Pedagogy.
  46. UNESCO (2018). Journalism, fake news & disinformation: Handbook for journalism education and training. Available here: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265552.
  47. Zaçellari, M., & Reçi, L. (2024). Empowering Future Teachers with Media and Literacy Skills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development.