Main Article Content
Social Question and Answer portals allow users to post and answer questions on different issues, among which foreign languages. The present paper focuses on feedback requests, i.e. questions in which users of the site ask for linguistic feedback on short sentences or phrases. In particular, it reports on a research on how reliable is the evaluation of answers provided by the portal’s users to identify correct and good linguistic feedback. An observational approach was adopted on about 600 answers in the Italian version of Yahoo! Answers. Each feedback was evaluated by two expert teachers and their rating was then compared with the evaluation provided by the site’s users. Results show that, while the correlation between the votes of the community and the rating of the experts is rather weak, answers with a positive evaluation generally contain a correct feedback. We conclude, therefore, that caution must be exercised when using users’ evaluation as guidance on feedback choice.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.
The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.
For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code
- Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008, April). Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 665-674). ACM.
- Bower, J., & Kawaguchi, S. (2011). Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 41-71.
- Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436-458.
- Chapelle, C. A. (2006). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In CALL research perspectives (pp. 65-76). Routledge.
- Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi (the wisdom of crowds). Nature, 75(7), 450-451.
- Ferguson, R., & Shum, S. B. (2012). Social learning analytics: five approaches. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 23-33). ACM.
- Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109-124.
- Jin, J., Li, Y., Zhong, X., & Zhai, L. (2015). Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: An empirical study of an online social Q&A community. Information & management, 52(7), 840-849.
- Lin, C. H., Warschauer, M., & Blake, R. (2016). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 124-147.
- Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2016). Social networking and language learning. The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology, 255-268.
- Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Interactional feedback as instructional input: A synthesis of classroom SLA research. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 1(2), 276-297.
- Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1-39.
- Shum, S. B., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Journal of educational technology & society, 15(3), 3-26.
- Stevenson, M. P., & Liu, M. (2013). Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO journal, 27(2), 233-259.
- Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. Anchor.
- Vinagre, M., & Muñoz, B. (2011). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and language accuracy in telecollaborative exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 72-103.
- Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
- Zheng, B., Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Social media in the writing classroom and beyond. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-5.
- Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553-586.