Main Article Content

Abstract

Educators do not have to be mere "Translators" as manufacturers of algorithms for teaching in the infosphere, but must modulate it for everyone's purposes. This work aims to validate the moments of transformation, through which, over the centuries, the mathematical sciences, with the help of philosophy, have promoted the Natural Language Generation to formal models. The starting hypothesis intends to corroborate an epistemological framework, which assigns logical-mathematical reasoning to mental processes following four models: Chomsky, who, with descriptive grammar marks a new model for rewriting languages; Gross, who, with the relationship between linguistics, computer science, and mathematics generates a relationship concerning a strongly transdisciplinary domain, in which linguistics realizes computer-based models and procedures; Silberzstein's Nooj system for processing, describing and analyzing INLG fixed sentences. The focal part of the research is the work of comparison that the team carried out to validate the development of languages according to the Transformational Analysis of Direct Transitive by M. Silberzstein and the lexicon-grammar; probabilistic calculus, according to the Probabilistic latent semantic Analysis.

Keywords

Text Converter Digital Intelligence Mathematical Validation

Article Details

How to Cite
Bucciarelli, R., Capone, R., Tortoriello, F. S., Greco, M., Savarese, G., & Enriquez, J. (2019). Learning Analytics - Scientific Description and Heuristic Validation of Languages NLG. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135040

References

  1. Bernardini, S. (2017), Some reflections on empirical research approaches for the study of English. Department of Interpreting and Translating.
  2. Cefalato, P. (2004). Critica della ragione postcoloniale. Verso una storia del presente in dissolvenza (Vol. 21). Meltemi Editore srl, Roma..
  3. Chambers, A., Conacher, J., and Littlemore, J. (Eds.) (2004). ICT and LanguageLearning: Integrating Pedagogy and Practice. Birmingham: Birmingham University Press.
  4. Chomsky, Noam (2001). "Derivation by Phase".( In Michael Kenstowicz. Ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. MIT Press. Pages 1-52. (Vedi p. 49 nota 2 per un commento sull'E-lingua.)
  5. Chomsky, N. (1964), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Massachusetts Inst of Tech Cambridge Research Lab Of Electronics.
  6. Chomsky, N. (1956), Tre modelli per la descrizione della lingua. Transazioni sull'IRE sulla teoria dell'informazione (2): 113-124. doi : 10.1109 / TIT.1956.1056813.
  7. Chomsky, N., & Lightfoot, D. W. (2002), Syntactic structures. Walter de Gruyter,
  8. Cicalese, A. (1995), L’analisi dei nomi operatori con il verbo fare. Tra sintassi e semantica. Descrizione e metodi di elaborazione automatica della lingua d’uso. Loffredo, Napoli.
  9. Cook, V.J. & Newson, M. (2007), Chomsky’s universal Grammar (an introduction), Wiley-Blackwell.
  10. D’AGOSTINO, E., Elia, A., & Vietri, S. (2004), Lexicon-grammar, electronic dictionaries and local grammars of italian. Lingvisticae Investigationes Supplementa, 24, 125-136.
  11. Elia, A., Landi, A., Bucciarelli, R. (2000), Dalla grammatica al testo poetico. Loffredo editore, Napoli.
  12. Elia, A. (1984), Le verbe italien: les complétives dans les phrases à un complément. Schena; Nizet.
  13. Elia, A., Martinelli, M., & d'Agostino, E. (1981), Lessico e strutture sintattiche: introduzione alla sintassi del verbo italiano. Liguori, Napoli.
  14. Elia, A., Martinelli, M., & d'Agostino, E. (1981), Lessico e strutture sintattiche: introduzione alla sintassi del verbo italiano. Liguori, Napoli.
  15. Franceschini, S. (2019), Technologies and Didactics of Languages: Research-Experimentation-Productions.
  16. Giunti, M. (1983), Popper e Lakatos: due diverse giustificazioni del falsificazionismo. Dimensioni, 28, 128-156.
  17. Gross, M. (1986), Grammaire transformationnelle du français, Syntaxe du verbe. Cantilène, Paris.
  18. Harris, Z. S. (1964), Transformations in Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 108:5, pp. 418-122.
  19. Harris, Z. S. (1976), Notes du cours de syntaxe
  20. Hoffmann, T., 1999 “Proceedings of the Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty…”
  21. Ibrahim, A. H. (2003), Le cadre du lexique-grammaire. Linx. Revuedeslinguistes de l’Université Paris X Nanterre, (48), 101-122).
  22. Ibrahim, A. H., Dunn, P. F., & Brach, R. M. (2003), Microparticle detachment from surfaces exposed to turbulent air flow: controlled experiments and modeling. Journal of aerosol science, 34(6), 765-782.
  23. Jackendoff, R. S. (1972), Semantic interpretation in generative grammar.
  24. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1999), El aprendizaje cooperativo en el aula.
  25. Lamiroy, B. (2003), In memoriam Maurice Gross, Travaux de linguistique 46:1, pp. 145
  26. Landi , E. Bucciarelli R. Landi , A. (2000), Dalla grammatica al testo poetico: lezioni di linguistica. Loffredo editore Napoli
  27. Landi, A. (1999), Saggio sulla varietà diamesica del Bellum Africum. Hermes, 303-316.
  28. Nowak, M. A., Komarova, N. L., & Niyogi, P. (2002), Computational and evolutionary aspects of language, Nature, 417(6889), 611-617.
  29. O’Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A. (1990), Learning strategies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press.
  30. Odlin, T. (1994), Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics).
  31. Popper, K. R. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, trad. it. Congetture e confutazioni, Il Mulino, Bologna 1972.
  32. Ricerca condotta in un progetto Collaborative dal titolo Immersion in text typologies ed I.Ri.I.S, Salerno https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Javier_Julian_Enriquez.
  33. Rizzi, L. (Ed.). (2004), The structure of cp and ip: The cartography of syntacticstructures volume 2: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press on Demand.
  34. Sabatini, F. (2007), Il Sabatini Coletti. Dizionario della lingua italiana 2008 con CD rom. RCS, Milano.
  35. Sayad, A. (2002), La doppia assenza. Raffaello Cortina editore, Milano.
  36. Scelzi, R. (2010), Nel linguaggio specialistico. Studi di glottodidattica, 3(3), 118-140.
  37. Silberztein, M. (2015). Joe loves lea: transformationalanalysis of direct transitive sentences. In International Conference on Automatic Processing of Natural-Language Electronic Texts with NooJ (pp. 55-65). Springer, Cham.
  38. Veronesi, C. (2007). Popper filosofo della matematica. Collana Pristem/Storia. Popper, K. Il falsificazionismo di Popper. Availableat: (http://matematica.unibocconi.it/articoli/il-falsificazionismo-di-popper)
  39. Vietri, S. (2014), The construction of an annotated corpus for the analysis of Italian transfer predicates. Lingvistica e Investigationes, 37(1), 69-105.
  40. Wasow, T. (2017), Generative Grammar: Rule Systems for Describing Sentence Structure. The Handbook of Linguistics, 119-139.

Most read articles by the same author(s)